This is a mobile version, full one is here.
30 March 2016
Jare.io, an Instant and Free CDN
CDN stands for a Content Delivery Network. Technically, it is a bunch
of servers located in different countries and continents. You give them
logo.gif and they give you a URL, which resolves to a different
server depending on who is trying to resolve it. As a result, the
file is always close to the end-user and your website loads much faster
than without a CDN. Sounds good, but all CDN providers want money
for their service and usually a rather complex setup and registration
procedure. My pet project jare.io is a free
CDN that is simple to configure. It utilizes AWS CloudFront resources.
First, let me show how it works and then, if you're interested in the details, I will explain how it's done internally. Say you have this HTML:
I want this
logo.svg to be delivered via a CDN. There are two steps.
First, I register my domain at jare.io:
Second, I change my HTML:
Try it with your own resources and you will see how much faster they will be loaded.
It's absolutely free, but I ask you to be reasonable. If your traffic is huge, you need your own account in CloudFront or somewhere else. My service is for small projects.
Now for more technical details, if you want to know how technically this solution works. First, let's discuss what CDN is and how it works.
URL, DNS, TCP, HTTP
When your browser wants to load an image, it has a URL
for that, like in the example above. This is the URL:
There are three important parts in this address. First is
www.teamed.io, the host name,
and the tail
/images/logo.svg, which is the
To load the image, the browser has to open a
connecting your computer and the server, which has the image. To open a
socket, the browser needs to know the
IP address of the server.
There is no such address in that URL. In order to find the IP address, the browser is doing what is called a lookup. It connects to the nearest name server and asks "what is the IP address of www.teamed.io?" The answer usually contains a single IP address:
$ nslookup www.teamed.io Server: 172.16.0.1 Address: 172.16.0.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: www.teamed.io canonical name = teamed.github.io. teamed.github.io canonical name = github.map.fastly.net. Name: github.map.fastly.net Address: 22.214.171.124
IP address of
126.96.36.199, at the time of writing.
When the address is known, the browser opens a new socket and sends an HTTP request through it:
GET /images/logo.svg HTTP/1.1 Host: www.teamed.io Accept: image/*
The server responds with an HTTP response:
HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: image/svg+xml [SVG image content goes here, over 1000 bytes]
That is the SVG image we're looking for. The browser renders it on the web page and that's it.
The Network of Edge Servers
So far so good, but if the distance between your browser and that IP address
is rather large, loading the image will take a lot of time. Well, hundreds
of milliseconds. Try to load this image, which is located on a server
that is hosted in Prague, Czech Republic (I'm using
curl as suggested
$ curl -w "@f.txt" -o /dev/null -s \ http://www.vlada.cz/images/vlada/vlada-ceske-republiky_en.gif time_namelookup: 0.005 time_connect: 0.376 time_pretransfer: 0.377 time_starttransfer: 0.566 ---------- time_total: 0.567
I'm trying to do it from Palo Alto, California, which is about half a globe away from Prague. As you can see, it takes over 500ms. That's too much, especially if a web page contains many images. Overall, page loading may take seconds, just because the server is too far away from me. Well, it will inevitably be too far away from some users, no matter where we host it. If we host it here in California, it will be close enough to me and the image will be loaded instantly (less than 50ms). But then it will be too slow for users in Prague.
This problem has no solutions if the server generates images or pages on the fly in some unique way and if we can't install a number of servers in different countries and continents. But in most cases, such as our logo example, this is not a problem. This logo doesn't need to be unique for each user. It is a very static resource, which needs to be created only once and be delivered to everybody, without any changes.
So, how about we install a server somewhere here in California and let
Californian users connect to it. When a request for
to one of the edge servers, it will connect to the central server
in Prague and load the file. This will happen only once. After that, the
edge server will not request the file
from the central server. It will return it immediately, from its internal cache.
We need to have many edge servers, preferably in all countries where our users may be located. The first request will take longer, but all others will be much faster because they will be served from the closest edge server.
Now, the question is how the browser will know which edge server is the closest, right?
We simply trick the domain name resolution process. Depending on who is asking,
the DNS will give different answers. Let's take
cf.jare.io, for example (it
is the name of all edge servers responsible for delivering our content
in AWS CloudFront, a CNAME for
If I'm looking it up from California, I'm getting the following answer:
$ nslookup cf.jare.io Server: 192.168.1.1 Address: 192.168.1.1#53 Non-authoritative answer: cf.jare.io canonical name = djk1be5eatcae.cloudfront.net. Name: djk1be5eatcae.cloudfront.net Address: 188.8.131.52
An edge server with IP address
184.108.40.206 is located in
San Francisco. This
is rather close to me, less than fifty miles. If I do the same operation
from a server in Virginia, I get a different response:
$ nslookup cf.jare.io Server: 172.16.0.23 Address: 172.16.0.23#53 Non-authoritative answer: cf.jare.io canonical name = djk1be5eatcae.cloudfront.net. Name: djk1be5eatcae.cloudfront.net Address: 220.127.116.11
An edge server with IP address
18.104.22.168 is located in
Washington, which is far away from
me, but very close to the server I was making the lookup from.
There are thousands of name servers around the world and all of them
have different information about where that edge server
is physically located. Depending on who is asking, the answer will be different.
CloudFront is one of the simplest CDN solutions. All you have to do to start delivering your content through their edge nodes is to create a "distribution" and configure it. A distribution is basically a connector between content origin and edge servers:
One of edge servers receives an HTTP request. If it already has that
logo.svg in its cache, it immediately returns an HTTP response with its
content inside. If its cache is empty, the edge server makes an HTTP
request to the central server. This server knows about the "distribution"
and its configuration. It makes an HTTP connection to the origin server,
www.teamed.io and asks it to return
logo.svg. When done,
the image is returned to the edge server, where it is cached.
This looks rather simple, but it's not free and it's not that quick to configure. You have to create an account with CloudFront, register your credit card there, and get an approval. Then you have to create a distribution and configure it. You should then create that CNAME in your name server. If you're doing it for a single website, it's not a big deal. If you have a dozen websites, it's a time consuming operation.
Jare.io, a Middle Man
Jare.io is an extra component in that diagram, which makes your life easier:
Jare.io has a "relay," which acts as an origin server for CloudFront. All
requests that arrive to
cf.jare.io are dispatched to the relay. The relay
decides what to do with them. The decision is based on the information
from the HTTP request URI. For example, the request from the browser
has this URI path:
Remember, the request is made to
cf.jare.io, which is the address of
the edge server. This exact URI arrives at
relay.jare.io. The URI contains
enough information to make a decision about which file has to be returned.
The relay makes a new HTTP request to
www.teamed.io and retrieves the image.
The beauty of this solution is that it's easy. For small websites, it is a free and quick CDN.
By the way, when we query the same image through jare.io (and CloudFront), it comes back much faster:
$ curl -w "@f.txt" -o /dev/null -s \ http://cf.jare.io/?u=www.vlada.cz/images/vlada/vlada-ceske-republiky_en.gif time_namelookup: 0.005 time_connect: 0.021 time_pretransfer: 0.021 time_starttransfer: 0.041 ---------- time_total: 0.041
Most of the work is done by AWS CloudFront, while jare.io is just a relay that makes its configuration more convenient. Besides, it makes it free, because jare.io is sponsored by Zerocracy. In other words, my company will pay for your usage of CloudFront. I would appreciate if you kept that in mind and didn't use jare.io for traffic-intensive resources.